DeLano v. Dade County

Supreme Court of Florida

DeLano v. Dade County

312 So. 2d 731, 1975 Fla. LEXIS 3822

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in DeLano v. Dade County. Read the opinion of the Court — 287 So. 2d 288 →

Supreme Court of Florida·Decided April 10, 1975·No. No. 45722·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The petition, for writ of certiorari reflected apparent jurisdiction in this Court. We issued the writ and have heard argument of the parties. Upon further careful consideration of the matter, the briefs and record, we have determined that the cited decisions present no direct conflict as required by Article V, Section 3(b)(3), Florida Constitution (1973). Accordingly, the writ must be and is hereby discharged.

It is so ordered.

ADKINS, C. J., ROBERTS, OVER-TON and ENGLAND, J J., and AGNER and PATTERSON, Circuit Judges, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The petition, for writ of certiorari reflected apparent jurisdiction in this Court. We issued the writ and have heard argument of the parties. Upon further careful consideration of the matter, the briefs and record, we have determined that the cited decisions present no direct conflict as required by Article V, Section 3(b)(3), Florida Constitution (1973). Accordingly, the writ must be and is hereby discharged.

It is so ordered.

ADKINS, C. J., ROBERTS, OVER-TON and ENGLAND, J J., and AGNER and PATTERSON, Circuit Judges, concur.

DeLano v. Dade County, 312 So. 2d 731, 1975 Fla. LEXIS 3822 (Fla. 1975).

Pincite

312 So. 2d 731 (DeLano v. Dade County) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.