Delano Caterers, Inc. v. Department of Consumer Affairs

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Delano Caterers, Inc. v. Department of Consumer Affairs

50 A.D.2d 541, 375 N.Y.S.2d 327, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12271

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 18, 1975

StatusPublished

This text of 50 A.D.2d 541 (Delano Caterers, Inc. v. Department of Consumer Affairs) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Delano Caterers, Inc. v. Department of Consumer Affairs, 50 A.D.2d 541, 375 N.Y.S.2d 327, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12271 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1975).

Pincite

Opinion

— Determination of respondent Department of Consumer Affairs rendered October 29, 1974, suspending petitioner’s cabaret licenses in all five public rooms in the hotel premises operated by petitioner for a period of three months, unanimously modified, on the facts and in the exercise of discretion, to confine such suspension to that room only in which the violation charged against petitioner by respondent took place, and otherwise confirmed, without costs and without disbursements. We find, in the circumstances disclosed in the record, the modified penalty to be appropriate to the violation, whereas that imposed by respondent is excessive and confiscatory. Concur — Markewich, J. P., Kupferman, Tilzer, Lane and Yesawich, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— Determination of respondent Department of Consumer Affairs rendered October 29, 1974, suspending petitioner’s cabaret licenses in all five public rooms in the hotel premises operated by petitioner for a period of three months, unanimously modified, on the facts and in the exercise of discretion, to confine such suspension to that room only in which the violation charged against petitioner by respondent took place, and otherwise confirmed, without costs and without disbursements. We find, in the circumstances disclosed in the record, the modified penalty to be appropriate to the violation, whereas that imposed by respondent is excessive and confiscatory. Concur — Markewich, J. P., Kupferman, Tilzer, Lane and Yesawich, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

50 A.D.2d 541, 375 N.Y.S.2d 327, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12271, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/delano-caterers-inc-v-department-of-consumer-affairs-nyappdiv-1975.