Delaney v. Valentine

42 N.Y.S. 1123
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Delaney v. Valentine. Read the opinion of the Court — 11 A.D. 316

Opinion

PARKER, P. J.

I cannot discover any question in this case that was not decided by the general term on the former appeal. See 80 Hun, 476, 30 N. Y. Supp. 512. The law as then laid down fully sustains the conclusions of the trial judge in the record before us. It is not the province of this court to review the decisions of that court. Being controlled by that decision, therefore, I conclude that the judgment appealed from should be affirmed, with costs. Judgment in each of the cases affirmed, with costs. All concur,, except PUTNAM, J., not acting. See 42 N. Y. Supp. 335, 571.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Delaney v. Valentine, 42 N.Y.S. 1123 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1896).

42 N.Y.S. 1123 (Delaney v. Valentine) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Delaney v. Valentine
30 N.Y.S. 512 (New York Supreme Court, 1894)