Delaney v. Unemployment Appeals Commission

720 So. 2d 320, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 14722, 1998 WL 796651
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided November 18, 1998·No. No. 98-0448·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We reverse the final order of the Unemployment Appeals Commission, which reversed the referee’s decision finding that appellant was entitled to unemployment compensation benefits. In light of the nonspecific warning the employer gave to appellant concerning the consequences that [321]*321would be imposed if he continued to use company e-mail to transmit jokes, we hold that appellant’s subsequent e-mail containing a joke was a single act of poor judgment and not a willful or wanton disregard of an employer’s interests that would disqualify appellant from benefits. See Easton v. Unemployment Appeals Comm’n, 693 So.2d 712 (Fla. 4th DCA 1997).

DELL, SHAHOOD and GROSS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Delaney v. Unemployment Appeals Commission, 720 So. 2d 320, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 14722, 1998 WL 796651 (Fla. Ct. App. 1998).

720 So. 2d 320 (Delaney v. Unemployment Appeals Commission) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Gomez v. American Bankers Life Assurance Co. of Florida
839 So. 2d 894 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2003)
Garcia v. Viking Life-Saving Equipment America, Inc.
728 So. 2d 295 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1999)