Delaney v. Ashcraft
This text of 295 F. App'x 115 (Delaney v. Ashcraft) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
G.W. Delaney and Phyllis Delaney (the Delaneys) appeal following the district court’s 1 adverse grant of summary judgment to the last remaining defendants in their civil-rights lawsuit. We reject as meritless the Delaneys’ various challenges to the district court’s well-reasoned determination that there were no trialworthy issues on the constitutional, conspiracy, and state-law claims against Detective Paul Norris, see Smith v. Insley’s Inc., 499 F.3d 875, 879 (8th Cir.2007) (summary judgment standard of review); and the Delaneys have waived all other claims by not addressing them in their opening brief, see K.D. v. County of Crow Wing, 434 F.3d 1051, 1055 n. 4 (8th Cir.2006). Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
295 F. App'x 115, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/delaney-v-ashcraft-ca8-2008.