Delaney v. Amite Homes, Inc.
This text of 101 So. 3d 445 (Delaney v. Amite Homes, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
| granted. By judgment dated April 11, 2011, the district court determined Phillip Delaney lacked a right of action to institute this suit, and dismissed his claim with prejudice. The court of appeal correctly found the April 11, 2011 judgment became final when Mr. Delaney did not file a timely appeal. In light of the April 11, 2011 judgment, the court of appeal erred in finding the amended petition, substituting Dianne Delaney as a party, related back to the filing of the original petition.
Accordingly, the writs are granted. The judgment of the court of appeal is reversed, and the judgment of the district court granting defendants’ exception of prescription is reinstated.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
101 So. 3d 445, 2012 La. LEXIS 3403, 2012 WL 5275351, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/delaney-v-amite-homes-inc-la-2012.