Delaney v. Amite Homes, Inc.

101 So. 3d 445, 2012 La. LEXIS 3403, 2012 WL 5275351
Supreme Court of Louisiana·Decided October 26, 2012·No. No. 2012-OC-1640·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

| granted. By judgment dated April 11, 2011, the district court determined Phillip Delaney lacked a right of action to institute this suit, and dismissed his claim with prejudice. The court of appeal correctly found the April 11, 2011 judgment became final when Mr. Delaney did not file a timely appeal. In light of the April 11, 2011 judgment, the court of appeal erred in finding the amended petition, substituting Dianne Delaney as a party, related back to the filing of the original petition.

Accordingly, the writs are granted. The judgment of the court of appeal is reversed, and the judgment of the district court granting defendants’ exception of prescription is reinstated.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Delaney v. Amite Homes, Inc., 101 So. 3d 445, 2012 La. LEXIS 3403, 2012 WL 5275351 (La. 2012).

101 So. 3d 445 (Delaney v. Amite Homes, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Succession of Jacob v. Dear's Serenity House, LLC
108 So. 3d 784 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 2013)