Delamare v. Blake

6 Rec. Co. Ch. (S.C.) 327
CourtCourt of Chancery of South Carolina
DecidedJuly 1, 1726
StatusPublished

This text of 6 Rec. Co. Ch. (S.C.) 327 (Delamare v. Blake) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Chancery of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Delamare v. Blake, 6 Rec. Co. Ch. (S.C.) 327 (Conn. Super. Ct. 1726).

Opinion

Mr. Hume Council for the Complainant this day Moved for a Writt of Injunction to Stop the Defendants farther proceeding at Common Law, and prays that the Bill might be read, Ordered and read accordingly, He the said Hume Alledges, that the Agreement made and sett forth in the Bill of Complaint was fraudulently done and Obtained by the Defendant Blake; Council being heard and Debated on both sides Upon weighing and Considering of the said Bill It is the Opinion of this Court; that there is Sufficient Matter of Equity in the said Bill to grant an Injunction and it is therefore Ordered to be granted And that an Answer be put in by the Defendant by the first Thursday in September next.

Intr.

J. Skene Register

Upon the humble Petition of Benjamin Godin and the Reverend Mr. Alexander Garden 28 this day preferred to this Honourable Court for the reasons therein Contained

Ordered That it be according to the prayer thereof.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
6 Rec. Co. Ch. (S.C.) 327, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/delamare-v-blake-ctchansc-1726.