Delafield v. Sandford

3 Hill & Den. 473
CourtNew York Supreme Court
DecidedJuly 15, 1842
StatusPublished

This text of 3 Hill & Den. 473 (Delafield v. Sandford) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Delafield v. Sandford, 3 Hill & Den. 473 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1842).

Opinion

By the Court, Cowen, J.

This motion would have been well founded had it been made before the revised statutes ; but now a writ of error and order obtained at any time stays proceedings even after levy. (2 R. S. 494, 5, 2d. ed. § 29, 30.) The provision in the last section is, that if an execution shall have been issued and not fully executed, the service of the order shall stay, &c. It is supposed that the levy is a full execution within the meaning of the statute. Not so. To complete the execution, there must be a sale at least. There is no cause, therefore, either for setting aside the order or directing the sheriff to proceed.

Motion denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
3 Hill & Den. 473, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/delafield-v-sandford-nysupct-1842.