Delafield v. Mayberry
This text of Delafield v. Mayberry (Delafield v. Mayberry) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 01-10235 Conference Calendar
PAMELA G. DELAFIELD,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
versus
SCOTT MAYBERRY; PAM MAYBERRY; MAYBERRY GARDEN; KM & LM, LC.,
Defendants-Appellees.
-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 3:00-CV-2075-D -------------------- June 18, 2002
Before HIGGINBOTHAM, DAVIS, and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Because the appeal from the district court’s judgment has
been dismissed, Pamela Delafield’s appeal from the district
court’s order of January 22, 2001, reaffirming its prior ruling
revoking Delafield’s in forma pauperis status, is moot. See Case
v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Ins. Co., 456 F.2d 252, 253 (5th Cir.
1972). Accordingly, the appeal must be
DISMISSED.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Delafield v. Mayberry, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/delafield-v-mayberry-ca5-2002.