DeLaCruz v. State
687 So. 2d 66, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 366, 1997 WL 41008
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in DeLaCruz v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 734 So. 2d 1116 →
Opinion
We strike the condition of probation requiring the appellant to maintain fidl-time employment, and we remand the case to the trial court to modify the condition so as to require the appellant to “maintain or actively seek” full-time employment. Evans v. State, 608 So.2d 90 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992).
The appealed orders are otherwise affirmed. See Brock v. State, 667 So.2d 1014 (Fla. 1st DCA), review granted, 676 So.2d 1368 (Fla.1996).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
DeLaCruz v. State, 687 So. 2d 66, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 366, 1997 WL 41008 (Fla. Ct. App. 1997).
687 So. 2d 66 (DeLaCruz v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Brock v. State
667 So. 2d 1014 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1996)
Evans v. State
608 So. 2d 90 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1992)