Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/DeLaCruz v. State

DeLaCruz v. State

687 So. 2d 66, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 366, 1997 WL 41008
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedFebruary 4, 1997
DocketNo. 96-1669
StatusPublished

This text of 687 So. 2d 66 (DeLaCruz v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
DeLaCruz v. State, 687 So. 2d 66, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 366, 1997 WL 41008 (Fla. Ct. App. 1997).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We strike the condition of probation requiring the appellant to maintain fidl-time employment, and we remand the case to the trial court to modify the condition so as to require the appellant to “maintain or actively seek” full-time employment. Evans v. State, 608 So.2d 90 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992).

The appealed orders are otherwise affirmed. See Brock v. State, 667 So.2d 1014 (Fla. 1st DCA), review granted, 676 So.2d 1368 (Fla.1996).

MINER, ALLEN and MICKLE, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Brock v. State
667 So. 2d 1014 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1996)
Evans v. State
608 So. 2d 90 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1992)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
687 So. 2d 66, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 366, 1997 WL 41008, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/delacruz-v-state-fladistctapp-1997.