Del Villar v. Vekiarelis

59 A.D.3d 642, 872 N.Y.S.2d 921
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedFebruary 20, 2009
StatusPublished
Cited by12 cases

This text of 59 A.D.3d 642 (Del Villar v. Vekiarelis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Del Villar v. Vekiarelis, 59 A.D.3d 642, 872 N.Y.S.2d 921 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2009).

Opinion

In a proceeding pursuant to Election Law § 16-102, inter alia, to validate an independent nominating petition nominating Angel L. Del Villar as the candidate of the Community First Party in a special election to be held on February 24, 2009 for the public office of Member of the New York City Council, 21st Council District, the petitioner appeals from a final order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Strauss, J.), entered February 9, 2009, which granted the application of Digna Vekiarelis to [643]*643dismiss the amended petition based on the petitioner’s failure to strictly comply with the service provisions of the order to show cause, and dismissed the proceeding.

Ordered that the final order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

“ ‘The method of service provided for in an order to show cause is jurisdictional in nature and must be strictly complied with’ ” (Matter of Master v Pohanka, 43 AD3d 478, 480 [2007], quoting Matter of Hennessey v DiCarlo, 21 AD3d 505, 505 [2005]). Even if we accept the petitioner’s interpretation of the service provisions of the subject order to show cause, he nevertheless did not timely effect service of the order to show cause, initial verified petition, and supporting papers upon the objector by any of the methods of service which he claims were permitted. Accordingly, the application to dismiss the amended petition was properly granted and the proceeding was properly dismissed. Dillon, J.P., Balkin, Belen and Chambers, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Streng v. Westchester County Board of Elections
131 A.D.3d 652 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2015)
Dekom v. Moroney
110 A.D.3d 800 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2013)
Rotanelli v. Board of Elections
109 A.D.3d 562 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2013)
Littlewort v. Board of Elections
87 A.D.3d 642 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2011)
Nunziato v. Messano
87 A.D.3d 647 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2011)
Best Batchateu v. Peters
77 A.D.3d 1366 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2010)
Gorman v. Board of Elections
76 A.D.2d 658 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2010)
Lobo v. Soto
73 A.D.3d 1135 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2010)
City of New York v. Miller
72 A.D.3d 726 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2010)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
59 A.D.3d 642, 872 N.Y.S.2d 921, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/del-villar-v-vekiarelis-nyappdiv-2009.