Del Vecchio v. Del Vecchio

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Del Vecchio v. Del Vecchio

98 A.D.2d 708, 468 N.Y.S.2d 1007, 1983 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 21010

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 5, 1983

StatusPublished

This text of 98 A.D.2d 708 (Del Vecchio v. Del Vecchio) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Del Vecchio v. Del Vecchio, 98 A.D.2d 708, 468 N.Y.S.2d 1007, 1983 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 21010 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1983).

Pincite

Opinion

— In a matrimonial action, the plaintiff husband appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (McCarthy, J.), dated July 20, 1982, which denied his motion to vacate a judgment previously entered against him. The appeal brings up for review so much of an order of the same court, dated August 17, 1982, as, upon granting reargument, adhered to the prior determination (CPLR 5517, subd [b]). Appeal from the order dated July 20, 1982 dismissed. That order was superseded by the order granting reargument. Order dated August 17, 1982, affirmed insofar as reviewed. No opinion. Defendant is awarded one bill of costs. Lazer, J. P., Mangano, Bracken and Niehoff, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— In a matrimonial action, the plaintiff husband appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (McCarthy, J.), dated July 20, 1982, which denied his motion to vacate a judgment previously entered against him. The appeal brings up for review so much of an order of the same court, dated August 17, 1982, as, upon granting reargument, adhered to the prior determination (CPLR 5517, subd [b]). Appeal from the order dated July 20, 1982 dismissed. That order was superseded by the order granting reargument. Order dated August 17, 1982, affirmed insofar as reviewed. No opinion. Defendant is awarded one bill of costs. Lazer, J. P., Mangano, Bracken and Niehoff, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

98 A.D.2d 708, 468 N.Y.S.2d 1007, 1983 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 21010, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/del-vecchio-v-del-vecchio-nyappdiv-1983.