Del Vecchio v. County of Cayuga

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Del Vecchio v. County of Cayuga

19 A.D.2d 692, 242 N.Y.S.2d 711, 1963 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3513

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 27, 1963

StatusPublished

This text of 19 A.D.2d 692 (Del Vecchio v. County of Cayuga) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Del Vecchio v. County of Cayuga, 19 A.D.2d 692, 242 N.Y.S.2d 711, 1963 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3513 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1963).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment and order affirmed, with costs to the infant plaintiffs, Deborah, Cheryl, and Cynthia Del Vecchio. All concur’, except Henry, J., who dissents and votes to reverse the judgment against appellant County of Cayuga and to grant a new trial, on the ground that the court erroneously charged provisions of subdivision 17 of section 15 of the Vehicle and Traffic Law (now § 375, subd. 17). (Appeal by defendant from certain parts of a judgment of Cayuga Trial Term in favor of certain plaintiffs, in a negligence action; appeal by plaintiffs George D. Del Vecchio and Joan M. Del Vecchio from certain parts of the same judgment in favor of defendant for no cause of action; appeal by plaintiff Deborah Del Vecchio from that part of judgment which reduces her verdict; appeal by plaintiffs George Del Vecchio and Joan Del Vecchio from order denying motions for a new trial.) Present — Williams, P. J., Bastow, Goldman, Halpern and Henry, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment and order affirmed, with costs to the infant plaintiffs, Deborah, Cheryl, and Cynthia Del Vecchio. All concur’, except Henry, J., who dissents and votes to reverse the judgment against appellant County of Cayuga and to grant a new trial, on the ground that the court erroneously charged provisions of subdivision 17 of section 15 of the Vehicle and Traffic Law (now § 375, subd. 17). (Appeal by defendant from certain parts of a judgment of Cayuga Trial Term in favor of certain plaintiffs, in a negligence action; appeal by plaintiffs George D. Del Vecchio and Joan M. Del Vecchio from certain parts of the same judgment in favor of defendant for no cause of action; appeal by plaintiff Deborah Del Vecchio from that part of judgment which reduces her verdict; appeal by plaintiffs George Del Vecchio and Joan Del Vecchio from order denying motions for a new trial.) Present — Williams, P. J., Bastow, Goldman, Halpern and Henry, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

19 A.D.2d 692, 242 N.Y.S.2d 711, 1963 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3513, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/del-vecchio-v-county-of-cayuga-nyappdiv-1963.