Del Tyler v. Ingraham

119 So. 439, 9 La. App. 366, 1928 La. App. LEXIS 288
Louisiana Court of Appeal·Decided December 10, 1928·No. No. 11,537·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

JANVIER, Judge ad hoc.

The judgment in this matter was rendered on May 23, 1927. A motion for appeal was filed exactly one year later, to-wit: May 23, 1928.

Act 128 of 1921, which was passed to regulate the practice in the City Courts for the City of New Orleans, provides in Section 1, among other things, “Appeals shall be allowed, and be returnable to the Court of Appeal, within ten days, exclusive of Sundays, from the rendition of the judgment, * * *.” It is very plain that under this act, this appeal must be dismissed as having been taken after the expiration of the allotted time. This court passed on this identical question in “Estate of L. R. Saissont vs. A. S. Demourelle, 4 La. App. 160. The constitutionality of Act 128 of 1921 was attacked in that case and it was held that the act was in all respects constitutional and the appeal was dismissed. We must take the same action here.

It is, therefore, ordered, adjudged and decreed that the motion to dismiss be sustained and that the appeal herein taken be dismissed at appellant’s cost.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Del Tyler v. Ingraham, 119 So. 439, 9 La. App. 366, 1928 La. App. LEXIS 288 (La. Ct. App. 1928).

119 So. 439 (Del Tyler v. Ingraham) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Auto Painting & Repairing Co. v. Ware
152 So. 113 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1934)
Evans v. First Nat. Life Ins. Co.
142 So. 356 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1932)
Valley Securities Co. v. Levy
132 So. 795 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1931)