Del. Riverkeeper Network v. Middlesex Twp. Zoning Hearing Bd.

190 A.3d 1126
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided August 3, 2018·No. 270 WAL 2017·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM .

AND NOW, this 3 rd day of August, 2018, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. The Order of the Commonwealth Court is VACATED and this matter is REMANDED to the Commonwealth Court for reconsideration of its decision in light of Pa. Envtl. Def. Found. v. Commonwealth, 640 Pa. 55 , 161 A.3d 911 (2017). In addition, in light of the amendments contained in Middlesex Township Ordinance 127, which expressly include gas well development as a permitted use in the subject R-AG zone, and our decision in Gorsline v. Bd. of Sup. of Fairfield Twp., ___ Pa. ___, 186 A.3d 375 (2018) wherein we noted "this decision should not be misconstrued as an indication that oil and gas development is never permitted in residential/agricultural districts, or that it is fundamentally incompatible with residential or agricultural uses," we direct the Commonwealth Court to reconsider the relevance of Gorsline to its analysis of the issues on appeal in this case.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Del. Riverkeeper Network v. Middlesex Twp. Zoning Hearing Bd., 190 A.3d 1126 (Pa. 2018).

190 A.3d 1126 (Del. Riverkeeper Network v. Middlesex Twp. Zoning Hearing Bd.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related