Del Rio v. State
This text of 905 So. 2d 920 (Del Rio v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Manuel R. Del Rio appeals an order denying his motion to correct illegal sentence under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a). The decisions of the United States Supreme Court in Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466, 120 S.Ct. 2348, 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000), and Blakely v. Washington, 542 U.S. 296, 124 S.Ct. 2531, 159 L.Ed.2d 403 (2004), are not retroactive. Modest v. State, 892 So.2d 566, 567 (Fla. 3d DCA 2005). The decision in Ring v. Arizona, 536 U.S. 584, 122 S.Ct. 2428, 153 L.Ed.2d 556 (2002), is likewise not retroactive. See Schriro v. Summerlin, 542 U.S. 348, 124 S.Ct. 2519, 159 L.Ed.2d 442 (2004).
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
905 So. 2d 920, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 7238, 2005 WL 1163112, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/del-rio-v-state-fladistctapp-2005.