Del Rio v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Del Rio v. State

905 So. 2d 920, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 7238, 2005 WL 1163112

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided May 18, 2005·No. No. 3D05-537·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Manuel R. Del Rio appeals an order denying his motion to correct illegal sentence under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a). The decisions of the United States Supreme Court in Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466, 120 S.Ct. 2348, 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000), and Blakely v. Washington, 542 U.S. 296, 124 S.Ct. 2531, 159 L.Ed.2d 403 (2004), are not retroactive. Modest v. State, 892 So.2d 566, 567 (Fla. 3d DCA 2005). The decision in Ring v. Arizona, 536 U.S. 584, 122 S.Ct. 2428, 153 L.Ed.2d 556 (2002), is likewise not retroactive. See Schriro v. Summerlin, 542 U.S. 348, 124 S.Ct. 2519, 159 L.Ed.2d 442 (2004).

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Manuel R. Del Rio appeals an order denying his motion to correct illegal sentence under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a). The decisions of the United States Supreme Court in Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466, 120 S.Ct. 2348, 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000), and Blakely v. Washington, 542 U.S. 296, 124 S.Ct. 2531, 159 L.Ed.2d 403 (2004), are not retroactive. Modest v. State, 892 So.2d 566, 567 (Fla. 3d DCA 2005). The decision in Ring v. Arizona, 536 U.S. 584, 122 S.Ct. 2428, 153 L.Ed.2d 556 (2002), is likewise not retroactive. See Schriro v. Summerlin, 542 U.S. 348, 124 S.Ct. 2519, 159 L.Ed.2d 442 (2004).

Affirmed.

Del Rio v. State, 905 So. 2d 920, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 7238, 2005 WL 1163112 (Fla. Ct. App. 2005).

Pincite

905 So. 2d 920 (Del Rio v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related