Del Rio v. State

905 So. 2d 920, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 7238, 2005 WL 1163112
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedMay 18, 2005
DocketNo. 3D05-537
StatusPublished

This text of 905 So. 2d 920 (Del Rio v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Del Rio v. State, 905 So. 2d 920, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 7238, 2005 WL 1163112 (Fla. Ct. App. 2005).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Manuel R. Del Rio appeals an order denying his motion to correct illegal sentence under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a). The decisions of the United States Supreme Court in Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466, 120 S.Ct. 2348, 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000), and Blakely v. Washington, 542 U.S. 296, 124 S.Ct. 2531, 159 L.Ed.2d 403 (2004), are not retroactive. Modest v. State, 892 So.2d 566, 567 (Fla. 3d DCA 2005). The decision in Ring v. Arizona, 536 U.S. 584, 122 S.Ct. 2428, 153 L.Ed.2d 556 (2002), is likewise not retroactive. See Schriro v. Summerlin, 542 U.S. 348, 124 S.Ct. 2519, 159 L.Ed.2d 442 (2004).

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Apprendi v. New Jersey
530 U.S. 466 (Supreme Court, 2000)
Ring v. Arizona
536 U.S. 584 (Supreme Court, 2002)
Blakely v. Washington
542 U.S. 296 (Supreme Court, 2004)
Schriro v. Summerlin
542 U.S. 348 (Supreme Court, 2004)
Modest v. State
892 So. 2d 566 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2005)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
905 So. 2d 920, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 7238, 2005 WL 1163112, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/del-rio-v-state-fladistctapp-2005.