Del Regno v. New York Railways Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Del Regno v. New York Railways Corp.

238 A.D. 575, 266 N.Y.S. 152, 1933 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9555

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 20, 1933

StatusPublished

This text of 238 A.D. 575 (Del Regno v. New York Railways Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Del Regno v. New York Railways Corp., 238 A.D. 575, 266 N.Y.S. 152, 1933 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9555 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1933).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The only issue presented is the adequacy of the award of the jury. Upon the printed record the infant would appear to have sustained no permanent injury and to have fully recovered his health six weeks following the injury. He continues to be a bright scholar after, as before the accident, skipping classes at school. The determination of the jury followed a three-day trial, during which the infant plaintiff was under then observation. The verdicts cannot be said to be against the weight of evidence.

The order should be reversed, with costs, and the verdicts reinstated.

Present — Finch, P. J., Merrell, McAvoy, Martin and Sherman, JJ.; McAvoy, J., taking no part.

Order reversed, with costs and disbursements, and verdicts reinstated.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

The only issue presented is the adequacy of the award of the jury. Upon the printed record the infant would appear to have sustained no permanent injury and to have fully recovered his health six weeks following the injury. He continues to be a bright scholar after, as before the accident, skipping classes at school. The determination of the jury followed a three-day trial, during which the infant plaintiff was under then observation. The verdicts cannot be said to be against the weight of evidence.

The order should be reversed, with costs, and the verdicts reinstated.

Present — Finch, P. J., Merrell, McAvoy, Martin and Sherman, JJ.; McAvoy, J., taking no part.

Order reversed, with costs and disbursements, and verdicts reinstated.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

238 A.D. 575, 266 N.Y.S. 152, 1933 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9555, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/del-regno-v-new-york-railways-corp-nyappdiv-1933.