Del Monte Dunes at Monterey, Ltd. v. City of Monterey

118 F.3d 660, 1997 WL 364759

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Del Monte Dunes at Monterey, Ltd. v. City of Monterey. Read the opinion of the Court — 127 F.3d 1149 →

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided June 26, 1997·No. Nos. 94-16248, 94-16313·Published

Opinion

[661]*661The petition for rehearing is granted. No further briefing is required. The parties shall be prepared to argue, for no more than 20 minutes per side, the following issue:

Whether the jury, rather than the judge, can decide if the City of Monterey’s actions substantially advanced a public purpose. (See part IIIB. of our opinion.)

Arguments shall be held in San Fransisco on August 6, 1997, at 10:00 a.m. The parties shall direct any further questions to the Clerk of the Court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[661]*661The petition for rehearing is granted. No further briefing is required. The parties shall be prepared to argue, for no more than 20 minutes per side, the following issue:

Whether the jury, rather than the judge, can decide if the City of Monterey’s actions substantially advanced a public purpose. (See part IIIB. of our opinion.)

Arguments shall be held in San Fransisco on August 6, 1997, at 10:00 a.m. The parties shall direct any further questions to the Clerk of the Court.

Del Monte Dunes at Monterey, Ltd. v. City of Monterey, 118 F.3d 660, 1997 WL 364759 (9th Cir. 1997).

Pincite

118 F.3d 660 (Del Monte Dunes at Monterey, Ltd. v. City of Monterey) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.