Del Monico v. McGovern

7 R.I. Dec. 73
CourtSuperior Court of Rhode Island
DecidedDecember 12, 1930
DocketNo. 84719
StatusPublished

This text of 7 R.I. Dec. 73 (Del Monico v. McGovern) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court of Rhode Island primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Del Monico v. McGovern, 7 R.I. Dec. 73 (R.I. Ct. App. 1930).

Opinion

HAHN, J.

Tbis is a motion to dismiss an action of replevin on the grounds that the Court (1) is without jurisdiction because the value of the goods replevied is not set forth, and (2) that the- bond is defective.

The plaintiff does not dispute these facts but asks to be allowed to amend the writ by adding the value of the goods and by correcting the bond.

The statement of the value is necessary in order to show that the Court before which the writ is returnable has jurisdiction.

Mack Motor Co. vs. Dorsey, 45 R. I. 65.

Defective bonds can not be amended. Simpson vs. Wilcox, 18 R. I. 40.

Motion to dismiss is granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
7 R.I. Dec. 73, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/del-monico-v-mcgovern-risuperct-1930.