Del Genovese v. Del Genovese

164 A.D. 895
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Del Genovese v. Del Genovese. Read the opinion of the Court — 149 A.D. 266

Opinion

We think that during the time of the lease taken by plaintiff’s husband, the decedent, his status was such as to justify a demand in equity for an accounting in equity. The judgment is, therefore, reversed and a new trial is granted, costs to abide the final award of costs, with leave to plaintiff to apply at Special Term for any amendment of her complaint that she may be advised is proper. (See New York & Brooklyn Ferry Co. v. Moore, 18 Abb. N. C.106; Marvins. Brooks, 94 N. Y. 71; Parker v. Pullman & Co., [896]*89636 App. Div. 208.) Jenks, P. J., Burr, Rich, Stapleton and Putnam, JJ., concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Del Genovese v. Del Genovese, 164 A.D. 895 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1914).

164 A.D. 895 (Del Genovese v. Del Genovese) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Marvin v. . Brooks
94 N.Y. 71 (New York Court of Appeals, 1883)
Parker v. John Pullman & Co.
36 A.D. 208 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1899)