Del Franco v. Perseo Et Ux.
This text of 127 A. 765 (Del Franco v. Perseo Et Ux.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
On June 19, 1923, decree pro confesso was entered against defendants for want of appearance after service on them of a bill in equity to enforce specific performance of a contract for sale of real estate. On August 28, 1923, defendants moved to open the decree, and testimony was taken on a rule for that purpose. By depositions, defendants endeavored to sustain defenses which should have been made before decree entered; but, after consideration of the grounds taken, the court below refused to open the decree. It is only necessary to say that we are not convinced of an abuse of discretion.
The order appealed from is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
127 A. 765, 282 Pa. 217, 1925 Pa. LEXIS 601, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/del-franco-v-perseo-et-ux-pa-1924.