Del Forn v. Del Forn

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Del Forn v. Del Forn

410 So. 2d 672, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 19483

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedMarch 16, 1982

DocketNo. 81-445

StatusPublished

This text of 410 So. 2d 672 (Del Forn v. Del Forn) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Del Forn v. Del Forn, 410 So. 2d 672, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 19483 (Fla. Ct. App. 1982).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The final judgment of dissolution is affirmed as to the reservation of jurisdiction and the award of lump sum alimony to the wife of the husband’s one-half of the marital home and the jointly held property, lo[673]*673cated at 229 S.W. 9th Street, Miami, Florida. See: Claughton v. Claughton, 393 So.2d 1061 (Fla.1980). It is also affirmed as to the monetary amount awarded to the wife of a portion of the monies collected on the joint income property owned by the parties.

Those portions of the final judgment requiring the “'forced sale” of real property, located in Pennsylvania and at 1053 S.W. 2nd Street, Miami, Florida, are reversed. The parties did not seek a partition and, therefore, the court cannot order partition of the property. See: O’Hara v. O’Hara, 327 So.2d 242 (Fla. 1st DCA 1976).

Affirmed in part; reversed in part.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The final judgment of dissolution is affirmed as to the reservation of jurisdiction and the award of lump sum alimony to the wife of the husband’s one-half of the marital home and the jointly held property, lo[673]*673cated at 229 S.W. 9th Street, Miami, Florida. See: Claughton v. Claughton, 393 So.2d 1061 (Fla.1980). It is also affirmed as to the monetary amount awarded to the wife of a portion of the monies collected on the joint income property owned by the parties.

Those portions of the final judgment requiring the “'forced sale” of real property, located in Pennsylvania and at 1053 S.W. 2nd Street, Miami, Florida, are reversed. The parties did not seek a partition and, therefore, the court cannot order partition of the property. See: O’Hara v. O’Hara, 327 So.2d 242 (Fla. 1st DCA 1976).

Affirmed in part; reversed in part.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

410 So. 2d 672, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 19483, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/del-forn-v-del-forn-fladistctapp-1982.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack