Del Castillo v. Johnson

Fourth Circuit

Del Castillo v. Johnson

625 F. App'x 204

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedDecember 21, 2015

DocketNo. 15-1421

StatusPublished

This text of 625 F. App'x 204 (Del Castillo v. Johnson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Del Castillo v. Johnson, 625 F. App'x 204 (4th Cir. 2015).

Pincite

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Alfonso J. Diaz del Castillo appeals from the district court’s orders dismissing his employment discrimination complaint as untimely filed and denying his motion for leave to file an amended complaint. We have reviewed the record arid find rio reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Diaz del Castillo v. Johnson, No. 1:14-cv-01642-LMB-TCB (E.D.Va. Feb. 24, 2015 & Feb. 26, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Alfonso J. Diaz del Castillo appeals from the district court’s orders dismissing his employment discrimination complaint as untimely filed and denying his motion for leave to file an amended complaint. We have reviewed the record arid find rio reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Diaz del Castillo v. Johnson, No. 1:14-cv-01642-LMB-TCB (E.D.Va. Feb. 24, 2015 & Feb. 26, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

625 F. App'x 204, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/del-castillo-v-johnson-ca4-2015.