Del Carmen Hernandez v. 34 Downing Owners Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Del Carmen Hernandez v. 34 Downing Owners Corp.

2017 NY Slip Op 1999, 148 A.D.3d 554, 48 N.Y.S.3d 898

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 21, 2017

Docket3456 156644/12

StatusPublished

Cited by5 cases

This text of 2017 NY Slip Op 1999 (Del Carmen Hernandez v. 34 Downing Owners Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Del Carmen Hernandez v. 34 Downing Owners Corp., 2017 NY Slip Op 1999, 148 A.D.3d 554, 48 N.Y.S.3d 898 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2017).

Pincite

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Jennifer G. Schecter, J.), entered October 17, 2016, which denied the motion of defendant building owner for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Summary judgment was properly denied in this action where plaintiff was injured when a door to the cellar of the restaurant at which she worked, which was located in the sidewalk abutting the building, swung shut and struck her on the head. Pursuant to its lease with nonparty Manhattan Mansions, which leased the commercial area of the building, defendant remained obligated to maintain and repair the cellar stairs and sidewalk. Although an out-of-possession landlord contractually obligated to make repairs may not be held liable unless it created or had notice of the dangerous condition (see Gomez *555 v 192 E. 151st St. Assoc., L.P., 26 AD3d 276, 277 [1st Dept 2006]; Torres v West St. Realty Co., 21 AD3d 718, 721 [1st Dept 2005], lv denied 7 NY3d 703 [2006]), here, defendant has failed to establish that it lacked constructive notice of the allegedly defective cellar door or that it did not create the condition.

Concur — Acosta, J.P., Renwick, Manzanet-Daniels, Webber and Gesmer, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Jennifer G. Schecter, J.), entered October 17, 2016, which denied the motion of defendant building owner for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Summary judgment was properly denied in this action where plaintiff was injured when a door to the cellar of the restaurant at which she worked, which was located in the sidewalk abutting the building, swung shut and struck her on the head. Pursuant to its lease with nonparty Manhattan Mansions, which leased the commercial area of the building, defendant remained obligated to maintain and repair the cellar stairs and sidewalk. Although an out-of-possession landlord contractually obligated to make repairs may not be held liable unless it created or had notice of the dangerous condition (see Gomez *555 v 192 E. 151st St. Assoc., L.P., 26 AD3d 276, 277 [1st Dept 2006]; Torres v West St. Realty Co., 21 AD3d 718, 721 [1st Dept 2005], lv denied 7 NY3d 703 [2006]), here, defendant has failed to establish that it lacked constructive notice of the allegedly defective cellar door or that it did not create the condition.

Concur — Acosta, J.P., Renwick, Manzanet-Daniels, Webber and Gesmer, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

2017 NY Slip Op 1999, 148 A.D.3d 554, 48 N.Y.S.3d 898, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/del-carmen-hernandez-v-34-downing-owners-corp-nyappdiv-2017.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack