Del Balso Construction Corp. v. State Tax Commissioner

1 Ct. Cl. 15
CourtWest Virginia Court of Claims
DecidedNovember 26, 1941
DocketNo. 16
StatusPublished

This text of 1 Ct. Cl. 15 (Del Balso Construction Corp. v. State Tax Commissioner) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering West Virginia Court of Claims primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Del Balso Construction Corp. v. State Tax Commissioner, 1 Ct. Cl. 15 (W. Va. Super. Ct. 1941).

Opinion

WALTER M. ELSWICK, Judge.

In this case the claimant, Del Balso Construction Corporation, filed a claim for refund of $133.65 for taxes paid on gasoline purchased during the month of May 1941 used as a motor [16]*16fuel for diesel engines not operated upon the public highways or streets of this state. It appears from the evidence that no claim for refund was filed with the state tax commissioner within sixty days from the date of purchase or delivery of the same, the most recent purchase and delivery having been made approximately sixty-three days prior to date of filing for refund. The state tax commissioner refused to make payment of refund for the reason that application for refund had not been filed within the sixty-day period as provided by chapter 11, article 14, section 20 of the code of West Virginia, as amended and reenacted by acts of the legislature 1939, chapter 124.

The right to receive a refund of taxes in certain instances where the gasoline purchased is not used in motor vehicles upon the public highways or streets of this state is given to the user under said section 20, article 14, chapter 11 of the code as reenacted by acts of 1939, chapter 124, which provides for a refund of tax on gasoline used for certain specific purposes to be made by the state tax commissioner, conditioned on application being filed, by the person using same, with the tax commissioner within sixty days from the date of purchase or delivery of the gasoline, which specific uses are set forth in the present statute as follows:

“Any person who shall buy in quantities of twenty-five gallons or more, at any one time, gasoline as defined by this article, for the purpose of and the same is actually used (a) as a motor fuel for diesel engines not operated upon the public highways or streets of this state, or (b) as a motor, fuel to operate tractors and gas engines or threshing machines for agricultural purposes, when such operation is not, in whole or in part, upon the public highways or streets of this state, or (c) as a motor fuel to operate aeroplanes or other aircraft, or (d) by any railway company subject to regulation by the public service commission of West Virginia, for any purpose other than upon the public highways or streets of this state, or (e) in the business of manufacturing, or in the production of natural resources, either as a motor fuel or for any other purpose except upon the public highways and streets of this state, or (f) as a cleaning fluid in any laundry or [17]*17dry cleaning business, or (g) as a motor fuel in motor boats or other water craft operated upon the navigable streams of this state, may, if the gasoline tax imposed by this article shall have previously been paid upon such gasoline, be refunded a sum equal to the amount of such tax, upon presenting to the tax commissioner an affidavit, . . . Provided, however, That the tax commissioner shall cause refund to be made under authority of this section only when application for refund is filed with the tax commissioner . . . within sixty days from the date of purchase or delivery of the gasoline.”

The claimant asks this court to make an award with recommendation that the Legislature direct refund of this amount paid and to disregard said section 20 of article 14, chapter 11 of the code as amended and reenacted by chapter 124 of the 1939 acts of the Legislature.

To determine such right of the claimant on its contention herein it is necessary to observe the apparent policy of the Legislature relative to refunds on gasoline in uses of this nature as will appear from an examination of the several changes made in the statute permitting refunds from time to time since the passage of the gasoline tax act and the adoption of the section relating to the refund provision now contained' in said section 20.

The first act imposing an excise tax upon gasoline was chapter 34 of the acts of the Legislature of 1923, which insofar as it pertains to the imposition of the tax read as follows:

“A state tax of two cents for each gallon, is hereby imposed on all gasoline sold in this state at wholesale as the words ‘at wholesale’ are hereinafter defined.”

There was not any exemption as to any quantity, or use of the same provided for, nor was there any provision for refund made for any purpose in the 1923 act.

The 1923 act was reenacted by chapter 2 of acts of the Legislature of 1925, extraordinary session, which imposed a tax of three and one-half cents per gallon thereon upon every person [18]*18a distributor, retail dealer or importer under the terms of the act based on the quantities of all gasoline sold, purchased or used in this state, which act by section 17 thereof provided for a refund of tax paid on gasoline used for certain specified purposes, provided that application for refund was made as set forth therein, as follows:

“Any person who shall buy, in quantities of twenty-five gallons or more at any one time, any gasoline as defined in this act for the purpose of, and the same is actually used for operating and propelling boats, tractors used for agricultural purposes, or who shall purchase and use any of such gasoline for cleaning or dyeing or other commercial uses, except in motor vehicles operated, or intended to be operated in whole or in part unon any of the public highways, streets or alleys of this state, which gasoline shall have been previously included in the measure by which the excise tax imposed by this act is determined, shall be reimbursed and repaid a sum equal to the amount of such tax, upon presenting to the tax commissioner an affidavit . . provided, that application for refund as provided herein must be filed with tax commissioner within sixty days from the date of sale or invoice, on forms prepared and furnished by the tax commissioner, or not at all.”

Said chapter 2 of the 1925 acts was reenacted by chapter 18 of the 1927 acts which enlarged the classifications prescribing uses of gasoline on which refunds were permitted but retained a proviso requiring that application for refund should be made within sixty days, which refund provision of the 1927 acts was adopted by the official code of 1931 as chapter 11, article 14, section 20, and then appeared as follows:

“Any person who shall buy, in quantities of twenty-five gallons or more at any one time, any gasoline as defined in this article, for the purpose of, and the same is actually used for, operating and propelling boats, aeroplanes, tractors used for agricultural or other purposes, road rollers, steam shovels, compressors, pumps, stationary gas engines, threshing machines or other gasoline-operated machinery, except motor vehicles; or who shall purchase and use such gasoline for cleaning , [19]*19and dyeing or for manufacturing or other commercial uses, except in motor vehicles, which gasoline shall have been previously included in the measure by which the excise -tax imposed by this article is determined, shall be reimbursed and repaid a sum equal to the amount of such tax, .. Provided, That the tax commissioner shall cause refund to be made under authority of this section only when application for refund, as herein provided, is filed with the tax commissioner, upon forms prepared and furnished by the tax commissioner, within sixty days from the date of purchase or delivery of the gasoline: ..

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1 Ct. Cl. 15, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/del-balso-construction-corp-v-state-tax-commissioner-wvctcl-1941.