Dekle v. Bank of Dawson
This text of 175 S.E. 248 (Dekle v. Bank of Dawson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
The lands and the crops which were the subject-matter of the suit formed a common res as to which the plaintiff sought relief against each defendant. The petition therefore was not multifarious. It stated a cause of action against all defendants for partition, and for an accounting for plaintiff’s undivided interest in the crops which were delivered to the bank to be applied on the debt of the other tenants in common. The petition thus stated a cause of action for some of the relief prayed for. The court erred in dismissing it on the ground that it failed to set forth a cause of action, or on the ground that it was multifarious.
Judgment reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
175 S.E. 248, 179 Ga. 67, 1934 Ga. LEXIS 217, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dekle-v-bank-of-dawson-ga-1934.