Deka Int'l S.A. Luxemborg v. Genzyme Corp.

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Deka Int'l S.A. Luxemborg v. Genzyme Corp.. Read the opinion of the Court — 754 F.3d 31 →

Court of Appeals for the First Circuit·Decided June 9, 2014·No. 13-1085·Errata

Opinion

United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit

No. 13-1085

IN RE: GENZYME CORP. SECURITIES LITIGATION,

DEKA INTERNATIONAL S.A. LUXEMBOURG; CITY OF EDINBURGH COUNCIL AS ADMINISTERING AUTHORITY OF THE LOTHIAN PENSION FUND; GOVERNMENT OF GUAM RETIREMENT FUND,

Plaintiffs, Appellants,

VIVIAN OH, individually and on behalf of all other similarly situated; JON RAHN, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated; GENZYME INSTITUTIONAL INVESTORS,

Plaintiffs,

GENZYME CORPORATION; HENRI A. TERMEER; DAVID P. MEEKER; MICHAEL S. WYZGA; ALLISON LAWTON; MARK R. BAMFORTH; GEOFFREY MCDONOUGH,

Defendants, Appellees.

ERRATA SHEET

The opinion of this Court issued on June 5, 2014, is amended as follows:

On page 6, line 6: replace "David Termeer" with "Henri Termeer"

On page 25, line 14: delete the apostrophe in "Plaintiffs' claim" to read: "Plaintiffs claim"

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit

No. 13-1085

IN RE: GENZYME CORP. SECURITIES LITIGATION,

DEKA INTERNATIONAL S.A. LUXEMBOURG; CITY OF EDINBURGH COUNCIL AS ADMINISTERING AUTHORITY OF THE LOTHIAN PENSION FUND; GOVERNMENT OF GUAM RETIREMENT FUND,

Plaintiffs, Appellants,

VIVIAN OH, individually and on behalf of all other similarly situated; JON RAHN, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated; GENZYME INSTITUTIONAL INVESTORS,

Plaintiffs,

GENZYME CORPORATION; HENRI A. TERMEER; DAVID P. MEEKER; MICHAEL S. WYZGA; ALLISON LAWTON; MARK R. BAMFORTH; GEOFFREY MCDONOUGH,

Defendants, Appellees.

ERRATA SHEET

The opinion of this Court issued on June 5, 2014, is amended as follows:

On page 6, line 6: replace "David Termeer" with "Henri Termeer"

On page 25, line 14: delete the apostrophe in "Plaintiffs' claim" to read: "Plaintiffs claim"

Deka Int'l S.A. Luxemborg v. Genzyme Corp., (1st Cir. 2014).

Pincite

Deka Int'l S.A. Luxemborg v. Genzyme Corp. (Deka Int'l S.A. Luxemborg v. Genzyme Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.