Dejuane Jackson v. State of Florida

248 So. 3d 1226
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJune 4, 2018
Docket17-5394
StatusPublished

This text of 248 So. 3d 1226 (Dejuane Jackson v. State of Florida) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Dejuane Jackson v. State of Florida, 248 So. 3d 1226 (Fla. Ct. App. 2018).

Opinion

FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA _____________________________

No. 1D17-5394 _____________________________

DEJUANE JACKSON,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee. _____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Escambia County. Edward P. Nickinson III, Judge.

June 4, 2018

PER CURIAM.

This direct criminal appeal was filed December 20, 2017, seeking review of a judgment and sentence rendered over thirty days earlier, on October 31, 2017. The appeal is untimely and must be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. See Fla. R. App. P. 9.140(b)(3); Miami-Dade County v. Peart, 843 So. 2d 363 (Fla. 3d DCA 2003). We write only to address Appellant’s argument, filed in response to our show-cause order, that the time to appeal was extended by a timely motion for reduction of sentence.

Appellant filed a “Motion to Reduce Sentence” on November 1, 2017, pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(c). In the motion, Appellant asked the trial court to reconsider its earlier sentence in light of pertinent facts, such as the possible sentencing range and the nature of the charges, as well as the effect the sentence will have on Appellant’s family and the cost of incarceration. The motion properly appeals to the discretion of the sentencing court under rule 3.800(c). It does not allege any error or otherwise seek correction of the judgment and sentence under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(b)(1). Therefore, Appellant’s motion did not extend the time to appeal. Cf. Fla. R. App. P. 9.020(i) (listing rule 3.800(b)(1) motion among the authorized motions that suspend rendition). Accordingly, the appeal is DISMISSED.

Any request for belated appeal must be filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.141(c).

WETHERELL, RAY, and OSTERHAUS, JJ., concur.

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331. _____________________________

Bruce A. Miller, Public Defender, and Nicholas Flippo, Assistant Public Defender, Pensacola; Randall J. Etheridge, Pensacola; Andy Thomas, Public Defender, and Steven L. Seliger, Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Miami-Dade County v. Peart
843 So. 2d 363 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2003)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
248 So. 3d 1226, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dejuane-jackson-v-state-of-florida-fladistctapp-2018.