DeJuan Geil Hollis v. State

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedFebruary 9, 2015
Docket05-15-00081-CR
StatusPublished

This text of DeJuan Geil Hollis v. State (DeJuan Geil Hollis v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
DeJuan Geil Hollis v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2015).

Opinion

Order entered February 9, 2015

In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-15-00081-CR No. 05-15-00126-CR

DEJUAN GEIL HOLLIS, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 291st Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause Nos. F13-51945-U, F-13-52021-U

ORDER The Court has before it appellant’s letter asking if counsel has been appointed for him in

these cases. The documents before the Court show that appellant filed a pro se notice of appeals

in the above cases following his conviction. The notices of appeal were docketed in this Court,

but it does not appear counsel has been either retained or appointed for appellant. Additionally,

the Court has not received the trial court’s certifications of appellant’s right to appeal, so it is not

clear whether appellant may appeal his convictions. The clerk’s and reporter’s records are due

by February 10, 2015, but it is also not clear whether appellant requested preparation of the

records.

Accordingly, we ORDER the trial court to make findings regarding the following.  The trial court shall first determine whether appellant is entitled to appeal the convictions. The trial court shall prepare certifications of appellant’s right to appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(a), (d); Cortez v. State, 420 S.W.3d 803 (Tex. Crim. App. 2013). Moreover, if the trial court certifies that appellant is not entitled to appeal, the trial court shall provide the written document that shows the basis for that certification.  If the trial court determines that appellant is entitled to appeal the convictions, the trial court shall determine whether is indigent and entitled to court-appointed counsel. If the trial court finds that appellant is indigent, we ORDER the trial court to appoint counsel to represent counsel to represent appellant in these appeals. If the trial court finds that appellant is not indigent, the trial court shall determine whether appellant has retained counsel and, if so, the name, State Bar number, and contact information for retained counsel.  With regard to the clerk’s and reporter’s records, the trial court shall determine: (1) whether appellant requested preparation of the clerk’s and reporter’s records; (2) if appellant is not indigent, whether he has paid or made payment arrangements for the clerk’s and reporter’s records; and (3) the names of all court reporters who recorded proceedings in the cases. We ORDER the trial court to transmit a record containing its written findings of fact, any

supporting documentation and any orders to this Court within THIRTY DAYS of the date of

this order. We further ORDER that the trial court include its certifications of appellant’s right to

appeal with the record containing its findings of fact.

We ABATE the appeals to allow the trial court to comply with this order. The appeals

shall be reinstated thirty days from the date of this order or when the findings are received.

/s/ LANA MYERS JUSTICE

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cortez, Damien Hernandez
420 S.W.3d 803 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 2013)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
DeJuan Geil Hollis v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dejuan-geil-hollis-v-state-texapp-2015.