DeJesus v. Royce
Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK JAIME DEJESUS, Petitioner, 22-CV-7212 (JMF) ~ ORDER MARK ROYCE, Superintendent, Respondent. JESSE M. FURMAN, United States District Judge: In this case, brought pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254, Petitioner Jaime DeJesus moves for a stay pursuant to Rhines v. Weber, 544 U.S. 269 (2005). See ECF No. 3. Respondent shall file any opposition to the motion for a stay by September 22, 2022; Petitioner shall file any reply by September 29, 2022. Respondent’s answer deadline is hereby STAYED pending a ruling on Petitioner’s motion. In addition, Petitioner’s request to substitute Respondent, see ECF No. 3, at 1 n.1, is denied as premature. Petitioner should promptly move for substitution 1f or when he is actually transferred. The Clerk of Court is directed to serve a copy of (1) this Order, (2) the Petition, ECF No. 1, and (3) the Motion to Stay, ECF No. 3, on the Attorney General of the State of New York and on the District Attorney of Bronx County by electronic means through use of the Court’s CM/ECF system. SO ORDERED. Dated: August 26, 2022 New York, New York JESSEWLFURMAN nited States District Judge
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
DeJesus v. Royce (DeJesus v. Royce) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.