DeJesus v. DeJesus

264 A.D.2d 436, 694 N.Y.S.2d 436, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8686
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedAugust 16, 1999
StatusPublished
Cited by7 cases

This text of 264 A.D.2d 436 (DeJesus v. DeJesus) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
DeJesus v. DeJesus, 264 A.D.2d 436, 694 N.Y.S.2d 436, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8686 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1999).

Opinion

In a matrimonial action in which the parties were divorced by judgment dated December 21, 1994, the defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Rockland County (Miller, J.), dated August 31, 1998, which granted the plaintiffs motion for counsel fees to the extent that it awarded her such fees in the sum of $15,000 and denied his cross motion to impose sanctions on the plaintiff.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The Supreme Court did not improvidently exercise its discretion in awarding counsel fees to the plaintiff (see, Domestic Relations Law § 237 [a]). The award was properly based upon evidence establishing the defendant’s financially-superior position (see, Kennedy v Kennedy, 128 AD2d 840).

Since the defendant failed to request a hearing on the plaintiffs motion for counsel fees and also failed to raise an objection to the submission of the issue of counsel fees based on papers, he has waived his right to a hearing on this issue (see, Matter of Zirkind v Zirkind, 218 AD2d 745; Rosenberg v Rosenberg, 155 AD2d 428).

[437]*437The defendant’s remaining contentions are without merit. Bracken, J. P., Thompson, Goldstein, McGinity and Schmidt, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Mollah v. Mollah
136 A.D.3d 992 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2016)
Silverstein v. Silverstein
60 A.D.3d 1073 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2009)
Schiffer v. Schiffer
55 A.D.3d 714 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2008)
Judge v. Judge
48 A.D.3d 424 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2008)
Timpone v. Timpone
28 A.D.3d 646 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2006)
Stadok v. Stadok
25 A.D.3d 547 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2006)
Bartek v. Draper
309 A.D.2d 825 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2003)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
264 A.D.2d 436, 694 N.Y.S.2d 436, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8686, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dejesus-v-dejesus-nyappdiv-1999.