DeJesus v. Alba
928 N.E.2d 409, 14 N.Y.3d 860, 902 N.Y.S.2d 27
Opinion
OPINION OF THE COURT
On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.11), order affirmed, with costs, and certified question not answered upon the ground that it is unnecessary. The Appellate Division properly concluded that no triable issues of fact existed whether defendant driver acted prudently under the circumstances.
Concur: Chief Judge Lippman and Judges Ciparick, Graffeo, Read, Smith, Pigott and Jones.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
DeJesus v. Alba, 928 N.E.2d 409, 14 N.Y.3d 860, 902 N.Y.S.2d 27 (N.Y. 2010).
928 N.E.2d 409 (DeJesus v. Alba) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Rawls v. Simon
2018 NY Slip Op 16 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2018)
A.C. Ex Rel. Naminata C. v. Ajisogun
2017 NY Slip Op 6894 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2017)
Fatumata B. v. Pioneer Transportation Corp.
118 A.D.3d 486 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2014)
GREEN, ANGELA D. v. HOSLEY, CATHERINE M.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2014
Green v. Hosley
117 A.D.3d 1437 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2014)
Ramirez v. Molina
114 A.D.3d 540 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2014)
Perez v. City of New York
104 A.D.3d 661 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2013)
Warley v. Grampp
103 A.D.3d 997 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2013)
Sakho v. City of New York
88 A.D.3d 581 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2011)
Corina v. Boys & Girls Club of Schenectady, Inc.
82 A.D.3d 1477 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2011)