Dejesus Fobbs v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided February 26, 2015·No. 01-15-00043-CR·Published

Opinion

COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER ON MOTION

Cause number: 01-15-00043-CR Style: Dejesus Fobbs v. The State of Texas

Date motion filed: February 16, 2015 Type of motion: Motion to Substitute Counsel Party filing motion: Appellant Document to be filed:

Is appeal accelerated? No

If motion to extend time:

Original due date: Number of previous extensions granted: Current Due date: Date Requested:

Ordered that motion is:

 Granted If document is to be filed, document due:  Absent extraordinary circumstances, the Court will not grant additional motions to extend time  Denied  Dismissed (e.g., want of jurisdiction, moot)  Other: _____________________________________ The motion does not indicate that appellant’s counsel, James Spencer, seeks to withdraw from representing appellant. See TEX. R. APP. P. 6.5. Additionally, the motion does not show that it was delivered to appellant “in person or mailed—both by certified and by first-class mail” at his last known address. See TEX. R. APP. P. 6.5(b), (d). Accordingly, we deny the motion to substitute counsel. By filing this motion, Joel H. Bennett has appeared as counsel of record for appellant. See TEX. R. APP. P. 6.2, 9.1. James Spencer remains as appellant’s lead counsel until new lead counsel is designated or a motion to withdraw or substitute counsel that complies with Rule 6.5 is filed and granted. See TEX. R. APP. P. 6.1(c), 6.5.

Judge's signature: /s/ Terry Jennings 

Date: February 26, 2015

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Dejesus Fobbs v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2015).

Dejesus Fobbs v. State (Dejesus Fobbs v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.