Deiter v. Escanaba Paper Co.
This text of 286 N.W. 797 (Deiter v. Escanaba Paper Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
The award should be affirmed. No objection was made by defendants to the opinion expressed by Dr. Gross, who had seen "this man throughout," as shown in testimony quoted by Mr. Justice WIEST.
The medical opinion evidence was based on testimony in the case and the witnesses' own observations of plaintiff's condition. What better evidence could be produced? No hypothetical questions were necessary under the circumstances, and no one contends that they were necessary. The opposition to the medical testimony is on other grounds.
The award is affirmed, with costs to appellee.
BUTZEL, C.J., and SHARPE, POTTER, NORTH, and McALLISTER, JJ., concurred with BUSHNELL, J. *Page 482
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
286 N.W. 797, 289 Mich. 478, 1939 Mich. LEXIS 638, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/deiter-v-escanaba-paper-co-mich-1939.