Deitcher v. Shuldman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Deitcher v. Shuldman

92 A.D.2d 581, 459 N.Y.S.2d 732, 1983 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 16830

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided February 22, 1983·Published

Opinion

Judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Murray, J.), dated June 17, 1982, affirmed, without costs or disbursements. No opinion. Defendant’s time to specifically perform the contract of sale dated December 8,1980 is extended until 90 days after the service upon her of a copy of the order to be made hereon, with notice of entry, and the time within which plaintiffs may exercise their conditional right to cancel said contract is extended until 30 days after service upon them of a copy of the order to be made hereon, with notice of entry or, if they have served a copy of said order with notice of entry, within 30 days thereof. O’Connor, J. P., Brown, Niehoff and Rubin, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Murray, J.), dated June 17, 1982, affirmed, without costs or disbursements. No opinion. Defendant’s time to specifically perform the contract of sale dated December 8,1980 is extended until 90 days after the service upon her of a copy of the order to be made hereon, with notice of entry, and the time within which plaintiffs may exercise their conditional right to cancel said contract is extended until 30 days after service upon them of a copy of the order to be made hereon, with notice of entry or, if they have served a copy of said order with notice of entry, within 30 days thereof. O’Connor, J. P., Brown, Niehoff and Rubin, JJ., concur.

Deitcher v. Shuldman, 92 A.D.2d 581, 459 N.Y.S.2d 732, 1983 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 16830 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1983).

Pincite

92 A.D.2d 581 (Deitcher v. Shuldman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.