Deinhart v. Pilato

12 A.D.3d 1032, 784 N.Y.S.2d 452, 2004 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14057
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided November 19, 2004·No. Appeal No. 1·Published

Opinions

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Monroe County (William P Polito, J.), entered December 3, 2003. The order, insofar as appealed from, denied the motion of defendant Elaine Pilato for summary judgment dismissing the complaint against her.

It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from be and the same hereby is affirmed without costs.

Memorandum: Supreme Court properly denied the motion of Elaine Pilato (defendant) seeking summary judgment dismissing the complaint against her. Defendant failed to tender sufficient evidence eliminating all material issues of fact from the case and thus failed to make a prima facie showing of entitlement to judgment as a matter of law (see Winegrad v New York Univ. Med. Ctr., 64 NY2d 851, 853 [1985]).

[1033]*1033All concur except Scudder, J., who dissents and votes to reverse the order insofar as appealed from in accordance with the following memorandum.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Deinhart v. Pilato, 12 A.D.3d 1032, 784 N.Y.S.2d 452, 2004 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14057 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2004).

12 A.D.3d 1032 (Deinhart v. Pilato) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Zuckerman v. City of New York
404 N.E.2d 718 (New York Court of Appeals, 1980)
Winegrad v. New York University Medical Center
476 N.E.2d 642 (New York Court of Appeals, 1985)
People v. Bowman
644 N.E.2d 1366 (New York Court of Appeals, 1994)
Santalucia v. County of Broome
205 A.D.2d 969 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1994)
Mattison v. Craig
266 A.D.2d 797 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1999)
Kandkhorov v. Pinkhasov
302 A.D.2d 432 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2003)