Deidris Woods v. State
This text of Deidris Woods v. State (Deidris Woods v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Opinion issued February 21, 2019
In The
Court of Appeals For The
First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-18-00460-CR ——————————— DEIDRIS WOODS, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
On Appeal from the 185th District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Case No. 1457437
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Appellant, Deidris Woods, pleaded guilty to the felony offense of assault on
a public servant. On September 5, 2015, in accordance with appellant’s plea
agreement with the State, the trial court signed an order deferring adjudication of guilt and placed appellant on community supervision for three years.1 Appellant,
acting pro se, filed notices of appeal on December 1, 2017 and May 11, 2018. We
dismiss the appeal.
In criminal cases, the appellant must file a notice of appeal “within 30 days
after the day sentence is imposed.” TEX. R. APP. P 26.2(a)(1). Because the order
appealed was signed on September 8, 2015, the deadline for filing the notice of
appeal was October 8, 2015. Appellant’s initial notice of appeal was filed on
December 1, 2017, over two years too late. If an appeal is not timely perfected, then
a court of appeals does not obtain jurisdiction to address the merits of the appeal and
can take no action other than to dismiss the appeal. See Slaton v. State, 981 S.W.2d
208, 210 (Tex. Crim. App. 1998). Because appellant’s notices of appeal were
untimely, we lack jurisdiction over this appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 25.1.
Moreover, in a plea-bargain case, a defendant may only appeal those matters
that were raised by written motion filed and ruled on before trial or after getting the
trial court's permission to appeal. TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. art. 44.02; TEX. R. APP. P.
25.2(a)(2). An appeal must be dismissed if a certification showing that the defendant
has the right of appeal has not been made part of the record. TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(d);
see Dears v. State, 154 S.W.3d 610, 613 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005). Here, the clerk’s
1 Although the State moved to adjudicate guilt in June 2017, the record, which includes filings up to appellant’s second notice of appeal in May 2018, shows no order granting the motion.
2 record supports the trial court’s certification that this is a plea-bargain case and that
appellant has no right of appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(a)(2), (d); Dears, 154
S.W.3d at 615. Because appellant has no right of appeal, we must dismiss this appeal
without further action. See Chavez v. State, 183 S.W.3d 675, 680 (Tex. Crim. App.
2006) (“A court of appeals, while having jurisdiction to ascertain whether an
appellant who plea-bargained is permitted to appeal by Rule 25.2(a), must dismiss a
prohibited appeal without further action, regardless of the basis for the appeal.”).
Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dismiss any
pending motions as moot.
PER CURIAM
Panel consists of Chief Justice Radack and Justices Goodman and Countiss.
Do not publish. TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Deidris Woods v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/deidris-woods-v-state-texapp-2019.