Deidre Elane Schamp v. Edward Mitchell
Opinion
jf ourtlj Court of
March 30, 2015
No. 04-14-00741-CV
Deidre Elane Sehamp, Appellant
v.
Edward Mitchell, Appellee
Trial Court Case No. 2013-CI-205S3
ORDER
The Court has reviewed the record and briefs in this appeal and has determined that oral argument will not significantly aid it in determining the legal and factual issues presented in the appeal. See Tex. R. Al'l'. P. 39.8. Therefore, all requests for oral argument are denied, and the cause is advanced for ON BRIEFS submission on May 12, 2015, to the following panel: Justice Marialyn Barnard, Justice Patricia O. Alvarez, and Justice Jason Pulliam. All parties will be notified of the Court's decision in this appeal in accordance with Tex. R. App. P. 48.
Either party may file a motion requesting the Court to reconsider its determination that oral argument will not significantly aid the Court in determining the legal and factual issues presented in the appeal. See Tex. R. API'. P. 39.8. Such a motion should be filed within ten (10) days from the date of this order.
It is so ORDERED on March 30, 2015.
'44+ Maralyn Barnanfi Justice
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and a/fixed the seal of the : court on this March 30, 2015.
e, Clerk'
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Deidre Elane Schamp v. Edward Mitchell (Deidre Elane Schamp v. Edward Mitchell) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.