Dehoyos-Maldonado (Pablo) v. State

Nevada Supreme Court·Decided June 14, 2019·No. 78887·Unpublished

Opinion

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

PABLO DEHOYOS-MALDONADO, No. 78887 Petitioner, vs. THE STATE OF NEVADA,

FILED

Respondent. JUN 1 4 2019 EL2ABETH A. BROWN CLERK OF SUPREME COURT

ORDER DENYING PETITION BY DEPLTI CLERK

This is an original pro se petition for a writ of habeas corpus.

We decline to exercise our original jurisdiction in this matter. See NRAP 22 ("An application for an original writ of habeas corpus should be made to the appropriate district court"); see also Zobrist v. Sheriff, Carson City, 96 Nev. 625, 626, 614 P.2d 538, 539 (1980) (indicating this court has discretion to decide whether to entertain an original petition for a writ of habeas corpus and that such petitions raising questions of fact should be considered "by a tribunal equipped to handle that task"). Additionally, we decline to intervene because petitioner failed to submit an adequate appendix for our review. See NRS 34.160; NRAP 21(a)(4). Accordingly, without reaching the merit of any claims raised, we ORDER the petition DENIED

emkutt: 11 .-"EstA;

Pickering lia.rdesty

cc: Pablo Dehoyos-Maldonado Attorney General/Carson City SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA

ge

(0) 1947A g -2s3&S

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Dehoyos-Maldonado (Pablo) v. State, (Neb. 2019).

Dehoyos-Maldonado (Pablo) v. State (Dehoyos-Maldonado (Pablo) v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Zobrist v. Sheriff
614 P.2d 538 (Nevada Supreme Court, 1980)