DeHorse v. DeHorse
This text of 563 F. App'x 226 (DeHorse v. DeHorse) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
David S. DeHorse appeals the district court’s order remanding the underlying action to North Carolina state court. We dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction.
Subject to exceptions not applicable here, “[a]n order remanding a case to the State court from which it was removed is not renewable on appeal or otherwise.” 28 U.S.C. § 1447(d) (2012); see E.D. ex rel. Darcy v. Pfizer, Inc., 722 F.3d 574, 581-83 (4th Cir.2013). Because the district court’s order does not fall within any of the exceptions provided under § 1447, the order is not appealable.
We therefore grant the Appellees’ motion to dismiss DeHorse’s appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the material before this court and argument will not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
563 F. App'x 226, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dehorse-v-dehorse-ca4-2014.