Dehon v. City of Stuart

150 So. 2d 254
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided February 27, 1963·No. No. 3327·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

(We have carefully considered the allegations of the amended complaint and the evidence offered. We find no reason to disturb the chancellor’s final decree dismissing such complaint. In this connection see the case of Boucher v. Novotny, Fla. 1958, 102 So.2d 132.

Affirmed.

KANNER, Acting C. J., ALLEN, J., and GERALD, LYNN, Associate Judge, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Dehon v. City of Stuart, 150 So. 2d 254 (Fla. Ct. App. 1963).

150 So. 2d 254 (Dehon v. City of Stuart) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Eskind v. City of Vero Beach
150 So. 2d 254 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1962)