Dehnke v. Commissioner

2 B.T.A. 1222, 1925 BTA LEXIS 2126
CourtUnited States Board of Tax Appeals
DecidedNovember 6, 1925
DocketDocket No. 420.
StatusPublished

This text of 2 B.T.A. 1222 (Dehnke v. Commissioner) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Board of Tax Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Dehnke v. Commissioner, 2 B.T.A. 1222, 1925 BTA LEXIS 2126 (bta 1925).

Opinion

OPINION.

Marquette:

We are unable to determine from the evidence presented the fair market value of the property in question as of March 1, 1913, or the cost of improvements and additions since that time. The testimony consisted of estimates by the taxpayer, not based [1223]*1223on his recollection of cost, and contains nothing upon which we would feel justified in overturning the Commissioner’s findings. No books or records of any kind were introduced in evidence, and the evidence of record leaves the March 1, 1913, value and the amount of additions and improvements a matter of speculation.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Appeal of Dehnke
2 B.T.A. 1222 (Board of Tax Appeals, 1925)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2 B.T.A. 1222, 1925 BTA LEXIS 2126, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dehnke-v-commissioner-bta-1925.