Dehler v. Golden Age Retirement, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Dehler v. Golden Age Retirement, Inc.

211 S.E.2d 199, 133 Ga. App. 322, 1974 Ga. App. LEXIS 1058

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedNovember 14, 1974

Docket49870

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 211 S.E.2d 199 (Dehler v. Golden Age Retirement, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Dehler v. Golden Age Retirement, Inc., 211 S.E.2d 199, 133 Ga. App. 322, 1974 Ga. App. LEXIS 1058 (Ga. Ct. App. 1974).

Pincite

Opinion

Webb, Judge.

1. "The complaint was in two counts. Since the motion for summary judgment was made as to the whole case, it was not error to deny the motion if there was a genuine issue of fact relating to either count.” Cato v. English, 228 Ga. 120 (1) (184 SE2d 161). Accord: Georgia Ports Authority v. Norair Engineering Corp., 131 Ga. App. 618 (206 SE2d 563) and cases cited.

2. The complaint here is in three counts (a fourth count was voluntarily dismissed), and the motion for summary judgment was made as to all relief prayed for in the three counts. Since there is at least a genuine issue of material fact as to a portion of the relief sought in Count 3, it was not error to deny the motion.

Judgment affirmed.

Pannell, P. J., and Evans, J., concur. *323 Ross & Finch, A. Russell Blank, Dean, Setliff & Bowman, William T. Dean, Jr., for appellees.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI