Dehkordi v. Kelley

21 Va. Cir. 375, 1990 Va. Cir. LEXIS 266
CourtFairfax County Circuit Court
DecidedOctober 18, 1990
DocketCase No. (Law) 96907
StatusPublished

This text of 21 Va. Cir. 375 (Dehkordi v. Kelley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Fairfax County Circuit Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Dehkordi v. Kelley, 21 Va. Cir. 375, 1990 Va. Cir. LEXIS 266 (Va. Super. Ct. 1990).

Opinion

By JUDGE QUINLAN H. HANCOCK

The Court has had this case under advisement in connection with a Motion for Change of Venue filed by Mr. Kelley on September 28, 1990. For the reasons stated below, Mr. Kelley’s motion is denied.

Simply stated, Mr. Kelley waived any objection to venue in this action when he failed to move his objection in the General District Court on or before the day of trial. See Va. Code § 8.01*264. To this end, even though an appeal from a court not of record is tried de novo, the Motion for Change of Venue is denied because the Circuit Court’s jurisdiction is derivative to that of the General District Court. Stacey v. Mullins, 185 Va. 837 (1946).

Additionally, the motion does not adequately address why venue is improper and where venue would be proper. Va. Code f 8.01*264.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Stacy v. Mullins
40 S.E.2d 265 (Supreme Court of Virginia, 1946)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
21 Va. Cir. 375, 1990 Va. Cir. LEXIS 266, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dehkordi-v-kelley-vaccfairfax-1990.