Dehghani v. Castro

District Court, D. New Mexico·Decided February 25, 2025·No. 2:25-cv-00052·Unknown

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO

AZADEH DEHGHANI,

Petitioner,

v. No. 2:25-cv-0052 MIS/DLM

DORA CASTRO, Otero Processing Center Warden,

Respondent.

ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS THIS MATTER is before the Court on Petitioner’s motion for a writ of habeas corpus ad testificandum. (Doc. 13.) In her motion, Petitioner alleges that the Court has scheduled a hearing for Wednesday, February 26, 2025, to hear oral argument and receive testimony regarding the Court’s order to show cause. Counsel for Petitioner has misinterpreted the Court’s directive, as the Court did not set a show cause hearing but rather ordered Petitioner to submit a written response. (See Doc. 12.) Petitioner challenges her immigration detention pending removal from the United States and asks the Court to grant her the relief of “Parole/Release.” (See Doc. 1.) Currently, Petitioner is confined at the Otero Processing Center and is scheduled for expedited removal from the United States at the end of February 2025 under 8 U.S.C. § 1225. (Doc. 8.) Under existing 10th Circuit precedent, this Court may review whether a petitioner was ordered removed under Section 1225. Vaupel v. Ortiz, 244 F. App’x 892, 894 (10th Cir. 2007). But by statute, the Court’s scope of jurisdiction to review the validity of Petitioner’s expedited removal order is limited. 8 U.S.C. § 1252(e)(5) (“In determining whether an alien has been ordered removed under section 1225(b)(1) of this title, the court’s inquiry shall be limited to whether such an order in fact was issued and whether it relates to the petitioner. There shall be no review of whether the alien is actually inadmissible or entitled to any relief from removal.”’) IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Petitioner’s motion is DENIED and the Court reiterates that its show cause order requires Petitioner to explain in writing how this Court has Jurisdiction to review the validity of Petitioner’s expedited removal order or to grant the relief Petitioner is requesting, no later than Wednesday, February 26, 2025, at 12:00 p.m. MST. IT IS SO ORDERED.

. Zz pews L Meg DAMIAN L. MARTINEZ UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Dehghani v. Castro, (D.N.M. 2025).

Dehghani v. Castro (Dehghani v. Castro) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Vaupel v. Ortiz
244 F. App'x 892 (Tenth Circuit, 2007)