DEHART v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

DEHART v. State

363 S.W.3d 133, 2012 WL 123109, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 44

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedJanuary 17, 2012

DocketED 96682

StatusPublished

This text of 363 S.W.3d 133 (DEHART v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

DEHART v. State, 363 S.W.3d 133, 2012 WL 123109, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 44 (Mo. Ct. App. 2012).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

David Dehart (Appellant) appeals from the motion court’s order and judgment denying his Motion to Reopen his post- *134 conviction proceedings. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude that the motion court’s denial of Appellant’s Motion to Reopen was not clearly erroneous. Gehrke v. State, 280 S.W.3d 54, 56 (Mo. banc 2009). An extended opinion would have no prece-dential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

David Dehart (Appellant) appeals from the motion court’s order and judgment denying his Motion to Reopen his post- *134 conviction proceedings. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude that the motion court’s denial of Appellant’s Motion to Reopen was not clearly erroneous. Gehrke v. State, 280 S.W.3d 54, 56 (Mo. banc 2009). An extended opinion would have no prece-dential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

363 S.W.3d 133, 2012 WL 123109, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 44, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dehart-v-state-moctapp-2012.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack