DeHarriet v. Pinedo

511 So. 2d 1130, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 2162, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 10181
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedSeptember 9, 1987
DocketNo. 87-0285
StatusPublished

This text of 511 So. 2d 1130 (DeHarriet v. Pinedo) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
DeHarriet v. Pinedo, 511 So. 2d 1130, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 2162, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 10181 (Fla. Ct. App. 1987).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Based on what was brought before this court, reversal is insupportable. As was said in Zimmerman v. Vinylgrain Industries of Jacksonville, Inc., 464 So.2d 1353, 1354 (Fla. 1st DCA 1985), echoing North Shore Hospital, Inc. v. Barber, 143 So.2d 849, 853 (Fla.1962), “[i]f there is any reasonable doubt in the matter of vacating a default, it should be resolved in favor of granting the application and allowing the trial upon the merits.” Accordingly, we affirm.

HERSEY, C.J., and GLICKSTEIN and GUNTHER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Zimmerman v. Vinylgrain Industries
464 So. 2d 1353 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1985)
North Shore Hospital, Inc. v. Barber
143 So. 2d 849 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1962)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
511 So. 2d 1130, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 2162, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 10181, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/deharriet-v-pinedo-fladistctapp-1987.