DeGraffenreid v. State
72 Ga. 212
Opinion
1. The conviction of the defendant in the mayor’s court, under a municipal ordinance, for disturbing the peace, will not protect the accused from a subsequent prosecution by the state for assault and battery, though the same transaction be involved in both cases. 59 Ga., 168.
'2 The charge was not erroneous; it neither expressed nor intimated an opinion on the facts, but stated hypothetically that if certain facts were proved, they would constitute assault and battery.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
DeGraffenreid v. State, 72 Ga. 212 (Ga. 1883).
72 Ga. 212 (DeGraffenreid v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Taylor v. Curry
113 S.E.2d 398 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1960)
Smith v. State
77 S.E.2d 764 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1953)
Jenkins v. Jones
75 S.E.2d 815 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1953)
Callaway v. Mims
62 S.E. 654 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1908)
Sutton v. Mayor of Washington
60 S.E. 811 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1908)