DeGrace v. Cromwell

District Court of Appeal of Florida

DeGrace v. Cromwell

195 So. 2d 42, 1967 Fla. App. LEXIS 5317

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedFebruary 10, 1967

DocketNo. 445

StatusPublished

This text of 195 So. 2d 42 (DeGrace v. Cromwell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

DeGrace v. Cromwell, 195 So. 2d 42, 1967 Fla. App. LEXIS 5317 (Fla. Ct. App. 1967).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The plaintiffs, Jack J. DeGrace et ux., appeal an order dismissing without leave to amend their second amended complaint for slander of title to real property by the defendants, Robert F. Cromwell et al.

The court has carefully considered the record on appeal, the briefs and oral argu[43]*43ment of counsel for the parties. From such consideration we find no reversible error.

Affirmed.

WALDEN, C. J., ANDREWS, J., and SAMPLE, WALLACE, Associate Judge,, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The plaintiffs, Jack J. DeGrace et ux., appeal an order dismissing without leave to amend their second amended complaint for slander of title to real property by the defendants, Robert F. Cromwell et al.

The court has carefully considered the record on appeal, the briefs and oral argu[43]*43ment of counsel for the parties. From such consideration we find no reversible error.

Affirmed.

WALDEN, C. J., ANDREWS, J., and SAMPLE, WALLACE, Associate Judge,, concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

195 So. 2d 42, 1967 Fla. App. LEXIS 5317, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/degrace-v-cromwell-fladistctapp-1967.