Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/Deglivomini v. Waldbaum's Supermarket, Inc.

Deglivomini v. Waldbaum's Supermarket, Inc.

236 A.D.2d 359, 654 N.Y.S.2d 328, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1047
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided February 3, 1997·Published

Opinion

—In an action to recover damages, for personal injuries, etc., the defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Golden, J.), dated March 15, 1996, which denied its motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The Supreme Court properly concluded that questions of fact exist which preclude summary judgment (see, Riviello v Waldron, 47 NY2d 297; Kirkman v Astoria Gen. Hosp., 204 AD2d 401; Santamarina v Citrynell, 203 AD2d 57; Heindel v Bowery Sav. Bank, 138 AD2d 787). Bracken, J. P., O’Brien, Florio and Luciano, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Deglivomini v. Waldbaum's Supermarket, Inc., 236 A.D.2d 359, 654 N.Y.S.2d 328, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1047 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1997).

236 A.D.2d 359 (Deglivomini v. Waldbaum's Supermarket, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Riviello v. Waldron
391 N.E.2d 1278 (New York Court of Appeals, 1979)
Heindel v. Bowery Savings Bank
138 A.D.2d 787 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1988)
Santamarina v. Citrynell
203 A.D.2d 57 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1994)
Kirkman v. Astoria General Hospital
204 A.D.2d 401 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1994)