Deglivomini v. Waldbaum's Supermarket, Inc.

236 A.D.2d 359, 654 N.Y.S.2d 328, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1047

This text of 236 A.D.2d 359 (Deglivomini v. Waldbaum's Supermarket, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Deglivomini v. Waldbaum's Supermarket, Inc., 236 A.D.2d 359, 654 N.Y.S.2d 328, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1047 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1997).

Opinion

—In an action to recover damages, for personal injuries, etc., the defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Golden, J.), dated March 15, 1996, which denied its motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The Supreme Court properly concluded that questions of fact exist which preclude summary judgment (see, Riviello v Waldron, 47 NY2d 297; Kirkman v Astoria Gen. Hosp., 204 AD2d 401; Santamarina v Citrynell, 203 AD2d 57; Heindel v Bowery Sav. Bank, 138 AD2d 787). Bracken, J. P., O’Brien, Florio and Luciano, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Riviello v. Waldron
391 N.E.2d 1278 (New York Court of Appeals, 1979)
Heindel v. Bowery Savings Bank
138 A.D.2d 787 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1988)
Santamarina v. Citrynell
203 A.D.2d 57 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1994)
Kirkman v. Astoria General Hospital
204 A.D.2d 401 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1994)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
236 A.D.2d 359, 654 N.Y.S.2d 328, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1047, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/deglivomini-v-waldbaums-supermarket-inc-nyappdiv-1997.